War on FOG

Follow along as we examine solutions to the challenge of fats, oils and grease in the country’s sewer lines and treatment plant works.
War on FOG
The LDS1000 long-distance CCTV inspection and leak detection platform, part of a suite of inspection tools offered by JD7.

Interested in Plumbing?

Get Plumbing articles, news and videos right in your inbox! Sign up now.

Plumbing + Get Alerts

Fats, oils and grease continue to plague sewer systems across the country by reducing sewer line capacity, clogging sewer lines and gumming up wastewater treatment plant works. 

“FOG has been a problem in this country since Colonel George A. Waring Jr. built the first separated sewer line in Memphis, Tennessee, circa 1880,” says Steve Tilson, president of Tilson & Associates, a consulting firm specializing in wastewater collections system operations and training. “Everyone’s trying to reach the goal of FOG-free sewer lines, but there is no single solution that will handle every FOG problem.” 

Part of the reason is that the fats, oils and greases that make up FOG are distinct, entering the sewer system from different sources and possessing unique chemical makeups. 

“Animal fats and tallows are generally introduced from manufacturing or rendering facilities and can harden in pipes over time, limiting sewer capacity and impacting sewer component longevity,” Tilson says. “FOG can be introduced from residential users and food service establishments. No single description will cover all of the sources.” 

Source control

The best strategy for reducing FOG problems remains source control, through a combination of mechanical separators, and regulatory and educational efforts. 

While community outreach and education takes many forms, the New York City Department of Environmental Protection is currently quantifying the effects of education on FOG, which was implicated in approximately 60 percent of confirmed sewer backups in the city last year. 

In 2013, the DEP collaborated with the New York City Housing Authority to target one housing development with an educational program outlining the impact of FOG on sewers, and proper disposal of grease and used cooking oil. 

“Grease has been identified to the public as a major bad actor,” says Jim Roberts, New York’s deputy commissioner for water and sewer operations. “By measuring levels of grease buildup in those sewers where the outreach was conducted and comparing that to grease buildup in a similar sewer without the program, we’ll be able to tell if our outreach program is working.” 

Some communities require that food service establishments and other related industries employ interceptors to separate FOG at those sources, but many do not. Few communities address the issue of high-density housing that can also be a significant source of FOG in a sewer system. Tilson recommends that communities consider changing building codes for high-density housing construction to include communal FOG interceptors to reduce costly sewer issues. 

“Source control is a major component of industry best practices,” Tilson says. “Encouraging source control nips the problem before it can become a threat to property and public health. As an added value, FOG can be used for a large number of purposes, from biodiesel to industrial detergents.” 

Temporary solutions

While additives such as degreasers, emulsifiers, enzymes and bacteria can temporarily break down FOG deposits, they’re only a temporary solution, says Tilson. 

“They’re spot treatments that will break down FOG or liquefy it long enough to move it farther down the sewer line, or into the treatment plant,” he says. 

There doesn’t appear to be any one additive that will permanently dissolve FOG to a state where these elements won’t recombine and replicate the problem farther down the pipe.

A FOG control study completed at California’s Orange County Sanitation District in 2006 by Environmental Engineering & Contracting Inc. compared several sewer-line-applied and food-service-establishment-applied additives among other approaches. While a few of the treatments showed some promise in certain applications, no single treatment was rated clearly superior to a well-maintained grease interceptor or thorough cleaning followed by CCTV monitoring. 

In fact, in many systems the use of enzymes, emulsifiers and grease gobbling bacteria by businesses is now illegal. “You can disrupt a sewage treatment plant by shifting its pH or introducing the wrong enzyme or bacteria,” Tilson says. 

Mechanical solutions

Time-honored mechanical solutions for FOG problems include jetters and rodders using a variety of attachments designed to remove FOG buildup. 

Pigging — sending a scrubbing device through a force main — can also offer relief. Ice pigging, a newer technology, employs a saltwater ice slurry to scour the inside of FOG-coated force mains. 

Problem behind the problem

John Shaffer, president of EEC, the company that conducted the Orange County study, has also noted that FOG problems are often the most obvious and immediate symptom of some other problem. 

FOG may collect in some areas because of poor pipe cleaning and maintenance, pipe defects, pipe sags or root problems. 

Tilson says, “Due to this, the only effective means of dealing with FOG in sewers is source control coupled with an effective preventive maintenance program.” 

For product solutions to help you deal with FOG, click here.


Comments on this site are submitted by users and are not endorsed by nor do they reflect the views or opinions of COLE Publishing, Inc. Comments are moderated before being posted.